BLACK SHEEP WHISTLEBLOWER
August 31, 2026
On August 18, 2026, I published an investigation into Michael Martinz and very deliberately separated what I could establish from what remained allegation.
My original investigation is here:
🔎 I GOOGLED MICHAEL MARTINZ — Here’s What the World Wide Web Says — and Why His Name Matters to Me:
https://blacksheepwhistleblower.com/2026/08/18/%f0%9f%94%8e-i-googled-michael-martinz-heres-what-the-world-wide-web-says-and-why-his-name-matters-to-me/
When I wrote that article, I did not claim to have independently verified that Martinz worked for or had a relationship with the CIA.
Then something happened.
After publishing the story, a tipster came forward with additional communications involving Martinz.
I am protecting that person’s identity.
Those communications contain statements attributed directly to Martinz concerning the CIA. They also appear to shed light on several other events that I had previously been trying to understand separately.
And suddenly some very uncomfortable pieces of this story begin sitting on the same table.
That does not establish that the CIA directed Martinz, participated in anything that happened to me, or even that Martinz was truthful about his claimed CIA connection.
But it means the claim is no longer something I am prepared simply to ignore.
THE ALLEGED MURDER PLOT BEFORE CHRISTMAS
Before Christmas 2025, information concerning an alleged plot to have me killed was reported to the RCMP and has since been investigated and the RCMP found no evidence to lay charges.
Michael Martinz was identified to me in connection with that alleged plot, the conspirator actually!!
I continue to call it an alleged murder plot because allegations are not convictions and I am not a court but I know more to the story and there’s nothing alleged about it actually.
But then came January 22, 2026.
My home was firebombed while my daughter and I were inside.
That actually happened.
So now we have an alleged murder plot before Christmas followed weeks later by a very real attack on my home.
That chronology alone does not prove who was responsible.
But it warrants investigation.
AND NOW THE CIA CLAIM
The communications subsequently provided to me contain what I understand to be Martinz’s own statements concerning the CIA.
That creates three obvious possibilities:
Martinz was telling the truth and he works for the CIA in Kelowna which if he’s behind these criminal actions against me this is paramount to espionage by an outside entity on Canadian citizens and I’m pretty sure that’s not great.
Martinz was exaggerating or fabricating an intelligence connection which I highly doubt because it’s in writing and no one in their right mind would say that because that would lead to a whole bunch of trouble.
Or there is some other explanation that I don’t presently know.
Any one of those possibilities is important.
But there is a difference between evidence that Martinz claimed a CIA connection and evidence that the CIA participated in anything Martinz allegedly did.
I presently have evidence relevant to the first question so I’m definitely not worried about getting sued but definitely worried about getting firebombed again or other.
I do not presently have evidence allowing me to declare the second proposition as fact…. But it’s not a stretch! And you’d have to be mildly retarded to not make that very tiny leap!!
WHY WAS MARTINZ COMMUNICATING WITH MY WIFE’S COLLEGE?
The communications supplied by my source also appear to support something else I have been investigating. Along with Communication I had with Martinz on October 21 2025 just days before the firebombing was reported to the RCMP on or about November 9 2025.
Martinz appears to discuss communicating with Selkirk College, where my wife is a Director.
The communications further appear to indicate that information concerning my daughter attending the College entered the conversation.
Here’s an excerpt you can decide for yourself noting in sure he wasn’t calling the college to tell them what a great guy I am that’s for certain.
Text exchange between Michael Martinz and me — October 21, 2025
For context: “Maggie” is the President of the College, where my wife works.
Michael: The college has actually just blocked dannys emails and doesnt care
Michael: I spoke to maddie at the college (he clearly spelled her name wrong with two d’s instead of g’s
Me: You spoke to Maggie?
Michael: Yes
Michael: Last week (which would have been before the murder plot was reported to the RCMP by days.)
Me: Are you fuckn serious (I was stunned)
Michael: Yup
Me: And she didn’t tell [my wife’s name]
Michael: Cuz they dont care bro
Me: You swear to god you spoke to Maggie?
Michael: Yes
Me: And Maggie did not tell [my wife’s name] now that’s very fucking interesting.
Michael: Just keep all the shit down please and lets let cooler heads prevail here
Michael: Cuz they dont care
That raises serious questions.
Who did Martinz speak with?
What did he say?
What information was provided to him?
Why was he seeking information concerning my family?
And what records does the College possess documenting those communications?
Those aren’t questions that require speculation.
There should be records.
THEN THERE’S MY (LEGAL) HANDGUN
Another part of the communications concerns information about a handgun I possessed.
I had deliberately told Martinz that my handgun was in my dresser.
What he apparently didn’t know was that I was treating that information as a breadcrumb. If the information subsequently surfaced somewhere else, I would have some indication of where it originated. It wasn’t in my dresser I don’t have a dresser actually!!
The communications I now possess raise questions about whether Martinz subsequently wanted a photograph of my handgun sent to Lucas Robinson.
I never sent Robinson a photograph of my handgun.
I didn’t know Robinson personally.
Yet Robinson appeared in my direct messages, communicated with me in a threatening or provocative manner and encouraged me to approach the RCMP concerning who he was. And martinz response to Robinson he advised me .. yep send him a photo of your Glock!!
I even challenged him to come to my house and talk face-to-face…Lucas that is!!
He didn’t because he’s clearly a pussy ..oh how I digress
The important question isn’t the internet bravado.
It’s this:
Was somebody attempting to manufacture circumstances that could result in me being investigated or charged concerning a firearm?
I don’t presently know… But that’s not a stretch at all.
But the communications deserve forensic examination.
THEN MY DAUGHTER ENTERS THE STORY
The material supplied to me also raises questions about a possible child and family services complaint involving my family.
Again:
Why?
Why was someone associated with an alleged threat against me interested in my daughter?
Why was my wife’s workplace apparently being contacted?
How did information concerning where my daughter attended school travel outside the College?
And what exactly was the intended purpose of a child-protection complaint?
Those questions become particularly disturbing because after the alleged murder plot surfaced, my daughter became frightened for her safety and stopped attending College.
She stayed home.
And that is why she was home with me during the middle of the day on January 22, 2026, when our house was firebombed.
She witnessed two individuals associated with the attack.
WAS JANUARY 22 A MESSAGE?
I cannot answer that question yet.
But I’m asking it.
Was the firebombing intended to frighten me?
Silence me?
Frame me?
Send a warning?
Or was it entirely unrelated to everything that happened beforehand?
Those possibilities need to be tested against evidence.
And there is another question that now cannot responsibly be avoided:
If Martinz’s statements about a CIA connection were truthful, did that relationship have anything whatsoever to do with what was happening in Canada?
I am not saying the CIA firebombed my home but I really believe he was complicit in it at the very least directing it perhaps because he knew he’d never get caught or be held accountable as he works for the freakn CIA ffs as he said himself the dumfuk in writing like the CIA gotta be like pull out plan Z and abort!!
I am saying that after receiving communications in which Martinz himself allegedly discusses a CIA connection, authorities should determine what that claimed relationship actually was.
IF MARTINZ WAS ACTING FOR A FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, CANADA NEEDS TO KNOW
If evidence ultimately established that any individual was acting on behalf of a foreign intelligence organization while attempting to harm, intimidate, manipulate, surveil or manufacture allegations against Canadians, that would obviously raise extremely serious questions.
But that conclusion cannot simply be assumed.
It must be proven.
That means identifying and authenticating the communications.
Preserving electronic records.
Establishing who communicated with whom.
Obtaining the College records.
Examining telephone and electronic metadata where lawfully available.
Determining what Martinz’s actual relationship, if any, with American intelligence was.
And comparing that evidence against the chronology leading to January 22, 2026.
THAT’S WHY I’M PUTTING THIS ON THE RECORD
The appropriate evidence has been or will be provided to the appropriate authorities.
I am also preserving the source material.
I’m protecting the identity of the person who came forward.
And I’m documenting publicly that these records exist.
Because the question is no longer simply:
Who is Michael Martinz?
The questions now include:
Why did he claim a CIA connection?
Was that claim true?
Why was he communicating concerning my wife’s workplace?
How did information concerning my daughter enter those communications?
Why was my handgun being discussed?
Why was a child and family services complaint apparently contemplated?
What relationship, if any, existed between these events and the alleged murder plot reported before Christmas?
And ultimately:
DID ANY OF THIS HAVE ANY CONNECTION TO THE FIREBOMBING OF MY HOME ON JANUARY 22, 2026?
I don’t presently know.
But I intend to follow the evidence wherever it leads.
🐑🔥🔎
Follow the evidence. Protect the source. Preserve the records. Establish the facts.
🌹 WHY I AM GOING PUBLIC
AGAIN, I AM ALSO PUTTING THIS EVIDENCE INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR A VERY SIMPLE REASON: IF I GO MISSING, IF I AM SERIOUSLY HARMED, OR IF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS HAPPENS TO ME, DO NOT ASSUME YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED.
PRESERVE THE EVIDENCE. FOLLOW THE BREADCRUMBS I HAVE DELIBERATELY LAID OUT. FOLLOW THE DATES, THE MESSAGES, THE NAMES, THE CONTACTS AND THE RECORDS.
I HAVE DOCUMENTED WHAT I KNOW, WHAT I HAVE BEEN TOLD, AND WHAT REMAINS TO BE PROVEN. I HAVE ALSO DISTRIBUTED MATERIAL TO APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES AND OTHER PEOPLE SO THAT THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT EXIST IN ONLY ONE PLACE.
IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO ME, START WITH THE EVIDENCE — NOT SPECULATION — AND FOLLOW IT WHEREVER IT LEADS.
EVIDENTIARY NOTE
This article reports allegations, communications supplied by a confidential source, documented events and questions arising from them. Statements attributed to individuals should be independently authenticated and considered in their complete context. Nothing in this article establishes that the CIA or any other intelligence organization authorized, participated in or had knowledge of the January 22, 2026 firebombing, nor does it constitute a finding that any identified individual committed a criminal offence.
Leave a Reply