My email went out June 8. My physical letter was delivered and signed for in Ottawa June 29. Forty-five days later, Commissioner Duheme relieved B.C.’s top Mountie over unspecified allegations dating from 2016–2018 that had been “recently brought” to the RCMP’s attention.
Coincidence? Maybe. You make the call.
BLACK SHEEP — AUGUST 28, 2026
Sometimes the chronology is the story.
And this is one of those times.
On June 8, 2026, I sent a serious letter electronically addressed directly to RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme at National Headquarters in Ottawa.
The reason I sent it was actually pretty simple.
I wanted the RCMP to finally clarify the historical record surrounding assistance I had provided to the organization years earlier and the consequences I believe flowed from what happened afterward. I am goin gto post the entire letter soon just not yet.
I am deliberately not publishing the identities of certain RCMP members I dealt with or the full details of the nature of my historical relationship with the RCMP and how the RCMP fucked me and left me and my family to the wolves and destroyed my families lives.
Those details are not necessary to make the point of this article.
What matters here is that Commissioner Duheme was being put on notice about historical matters that I believed deserved examination at the highest level of the RCMP.
My June 8 correspondence specifically requested that the RCMP review its historical records and provide clarification. It also explained why the issue had become urgent after the January 22, 2026 firebombing of my family home and my efforts to rebuild my professional life.
What I did not expect was what happened next. Well nothing actually because my family and I have lost faith in the RCMP and we know they are CORRUPT AF … we are not afraid of the bad guys my family is afraid of the RCMP ffs!!!
FIRST, THE EMAIL: JUNE 8, 2026
My formal letter was dated June 8, 2026. I will release the details of who it s was sent to and the content soon but suffice to say it had sensitive information contained within and I could have written handle with care on it … and make sure you dont respond to it which Duheme did not and will likely not but I think he responded in another way as you will see as you read on?!
It was sent electronically through RCMP channels and expressly addressed to Commissioner Duheme.
But I didn’t rely solely on email.
I wrote something very specific in the correspondence:
“For transparency and accountability, this correspondence is being delivered by both registered mail and email.”
I also stated:
“A copy of this letter is being mailed to the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at RCMP National Headquarters in Ottawa.”
And that is exactly what I did.
Which gives us a second independently documented date.
THEN THE PHYSICAL LETTER: JUNE 29, 2026
I retained the Canada Post tracking information.
The tracking number was:
MW623466450CA
Canada Post records show:
June 24, 2026: Received by Canada Post in Castlegar, B.C.
June 29, 2026 — 9:24 a.m.: Out for delivery in Ottawa, Ontario.
June 29, 2026 — 9:58 a.m.: DELIVERED — OTTAWA, ON.
And:
Signature available.
[CANADA POST TRACKING SCREENSHOT — “DELIVERED JUNE 29 AT 9:58 AM” — BELOW]
That matters.
There is a documentary trail showing that the physical correspondence I said I was sending to Ottawa actually arrived there.
But the delivery confirmation contains another interesting detail.
SOMEBODY SIGNED FOR IT BUT HIDE IT…
I obtained Canada Post’s delivery confirmation for the same tracking number.
It confirms:
Item: MW623466450CA
Product: Xpresspost
Delivery date: June 29, 2026
Then look at what Canada Post says about the person who accepted it:
“A name and signature have been captured for the item, but the signatory has requested that they not be displayed on our website.” LIKE WTF?!
[CANADA POST DELIVERY CONFIRMATION / SIGNATORY SCREENSHOT BELOW]
Now, I want to be careful about this.
I am not suggesting there is anything suspicious or improper about the signatory’s name being withheld. There could be an entirely routine privacy, security or institutional explanation for that.
What matters evidentially is much simpler:
SOMEBODY ACCEPTED AND SIGNED FOR THE PACKAGE IN OTTAWA.
Canada Post captured the person’s name and signature.
The person simply requested that those details not be displayed on Canada Post’s website.
So we now have two documented stages:
JUNE 8 — ELECTRONIC CORRESPONDENCE
JUNE 29 — PHYSICAL CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED AND SIGNED FOR IN OTTAWA
Keep those dates in mind.
Because then came August 13.
AUGUST 13, 2026: B.C.’S TOP MOUNTIE IS RELIEVED OF DUTY
Forty-five days after my physical correspondence was delivered in Ottawa, CBC News published this headline:
“B.C. RCMP commanding officer relieved of duties following unspecified allegations”
The subheadline was even more interesting:
“Dwayne McDonald has been replaced by John Brewer, following unspecified allegations dating from 2016 to 2018.”
[CBC HEADLINE / DWAYNE McDONALD SCREENSHOT ]
Let that sink in for a moment.
This wasn’t some junior officer.
Dwayne McDonald was Deputy Commissioner of the RCMP and commanding officer of the B.C. RCMP — the top Mountie in British Columbia.
Commissioner Duheme relieved McDonald of his duties and appointed John Brewer as interim commanding officer.
The RCMP did not publicly disclose what the allegations were.
And that is important.
McDonald has not been found responsible for anything based on the material presently available. Being relieved of duties while allegations are investigated is not a finding of wrongdoing, and he is entitled to procedural fairness.
But there were two details in the RCMP announcement that immediately got my attention.
The first was the timeframe:
2016–2018
The second was even more interesting.
THE THREE WORDS THAT MATTER: “WERE RECENTLY BROUGHT”
Look at the next CBC screenshot.
CBC reported:
“The statement says the allegations are under investigation, and they were ‘recently brought’ to the RCMP’s attention.”
[CBC McDONALD PHOTO / “RECENTLY BROUGHT” SCREENSHOT]
Read that carefully.
The allegations concerned events from:
2016–2018
But according to the RCMP, they had been:
“RECENTLY BROUGHT”
to the organization’s attention.
That’s when I started looking at my calendar.
NOW LOOK AT THIS CHRONOLOGY
JUNE 8, 2026
I electronically send correspondence addressed directly to Commissioner Mike Duheme concerning serious historical matters involving my dealings with the RCMP and request that the RCMP examine its records and clarify what occurred.
JUNE 24, 2026
Canada Post accepts my physical correspondence in Castlegar for delivery to Ottawa.
JUNE 29 — 9:24 A.M.
The package is out for delivery in Ottawa.
JUNE 29 — 9:58 A.M.
Canada Post records:
DELIVERED — OTTAWA, ON
A name and signature are captured.
AUGUST 13, 2026
Commissioner Mike Duheme announces that Deputy Commissioner Dwayne McDonald — the commanding officer of the entire B.C. RCMP — has been relieved of his duties.
The allegations concern:
2016–2018
And the RCMP says they were:
“RECENTLY BROUGHT” TO ITS ATTENTION.
From June 29 to August 13: 45 days.
From my original June 8 correspondence to August 13: approximately nine and a half weeks.
That does not prove causation.
But it sure as hell establishes a chronology worth asking questions about.
WHAT HAPPENED DURING THOSE 45 DAYS?
That’s the question.
I do not know what allegations Commissioner Duheme was referring to when McDonald was relieved.
I do not know who brought those allegations forward.
I do not know precisely when the RCMP considers them to have been “recently brought” to its attention.
And I cannot establish that my June correspondence triggered McDonald’s removal.
Maybe my correspondence had absolutely nothing to do with it.
Maybe another complaint or investigation arrived independently.
Maybe the timing is pure coincidence.
Or maybe my correspondence caused somebody inside National Headquarters to start asking questions, reviewing files or pulling on a historical thread.
I simply don’t know.
That’s why this article asks the question rather than pretending to know the answer.
But there is another part of Duheme’s announcement worth noting.
DUHEME FELT THE NEED TO REASSURE BRITISH COLUMBIA
Commissioner Duheme said:
“I want to reassure you that there will be no impact on RCMP operations or policing services in the province.”
Think about that statement.
The Commissioner apparently considered the removal significant enough to publicly reassure British Columbians that policing operations would continue unaffected.
And understandably so.
McDonald wasn’t simply commanding a detachment.
He headed E Division — the B.C. RCMP.
The RCMP has described B.C. as its largest division.
So whatever the allegations ultimately turn out to involve, Commissioner Duheme took the extraordinary step of removing the province’s commanding officer while they were investigated.
Again, that is not proof of misconduct by McDonald.
But it demonstrates the seriousness with which the allegations were being treated.
And I want to know what “recently brought” actually means.
WHY 2016–2018 IMMEDIATELY CAUGHT MY ATTENTION
Regular Black Sheep readers will understand why that particular historical period jumped off the page for me.
I’ve recently written extensively about the 2016–2018 timeline, Inspector Loeppky, the handling of the alleged murder plot against me, and the separate historical story involving Pastor Aldon Loeppky.
I’m not going to repeat all of that here.
The backstory is already published.
Start here and take note most importantly that I wrote this blog on August 4 2026 just 9 days before the TOP RCMP in BC was “relieved” of his duties!! Interesting right as maybe the blog ost had more impact that the letter?! Maybe I should change the title to NINE DAYS from 45…
Then read this because it’s really that 2016-2018 timeframe that had me on this which is why I don’t believe this is a coincidence since that’s exactly the timeframe I really got fucked over by the RCMP in BC and there were so many things that went wrong for me in BC that I could not explain like almost being arrested by the BC RCMP for criminal harassment and criminal extortion … the RCMP following me around town and a criminal complaint filed against me by the former CEO of Aston Bay whom I can’t name due to court gag orders that I “had guns” and was “damn crazy” noting I cofounded Aston Bay with this CEO and discovered the companies core property Storm Copper and and I was a Board of Director sooo yeah that’s just to name a few soo yeah I don’t believe in coincidences at all.
And:
Read those three pieces.
Then come back here and look again at:
2016–2018
and:
“RECENTLY BROUGHT.”
That’s why I noticed.
GARRY CLEMENT, COMMISSIONER DUHEME AND PUBLIC TRUST
There is another interesting piece of context.
Former RCMP officer Garry Clement, writing in The Bureau, recently published an opinion piece titled “Commissioner Duheme’s Repression Denials Will Not Restore Public Trust.”
Clement was discussing Commissioner Duheme’s comments concerning foreign interference — not McDonald’s removal and not my case — so those subjects should not be conflated.
But Clement makes a broader argument that I think is relevant here.
He argues that trust in institutions is not restored through broad assurances. It requires candour, precision and acknowledgement of what is known, what remains uncertain and what authorities are actually doing about it.
I agree with that principle.
Because eventually the public deserves answers about what happened here.
What exactly are the allegations concerning McDonald?
Why do they concern 2016–2018?
When precisely were they first brought to the RCMP’s attention?
Who brought them forward?
What did Commissioner Duheme learn?
And what caused him to relieve the commanding officer of Canada’s largest RCMP division?
Those answers may ultimately establish that this story has absolutely nothing to do with anything I sent Commissioner Duheme.
If that’s what the evidence shows, that’s what the evidence shows.
But right now, those questions remain unanswered.
WHAT I ACTUALLY WANTED FROM DUHEME
This is perhaps the strangest part of the entire story.
I wasn’t writing Commissioner Duheme on June 8 trying to remove B.C.’s top Mountie.
I wasn’t expecting anybody to lose their position.
My request was much more personal and straightforward.
I wanted the RCMP to tell the truth about my historical dealings with the organization and clarify the record.
I wanted information that could help me rebuild my professional career.
My letter expressly asked the RCMP to review its records and clarify the historical circumstances surrounding my cooperation with the organization.
I had spent more than a decade dealing with the consequences of what I believed was an incomplete historical record.
Then my home was firebombed.
Enough was enough.
So I went directly to the Commissioner.
AND THEN, 45 DAYS AFTER OTTAWA SIGNED FOR MY LETTER…
B.C.’s top Mountie was relieved of duty.
Let me state this one final time because the distinction matters:
I AM NOT CLAIMING MY LETTER CAUSED DWAYNE McDONALD’S REMOVAL.
I don’t presently have evidence capable of proving that.
What I have is something different:
A DOCUMENTED CHRONOLOGY.
June 8: My correspondence goes electronically to the RCMP and is addressed to Commissioner Duheme.
June 24: Canada Post receives my physical correspondence.
June 29 at 9:58 a.m.: Canada Post confirms delivery in Ottawa.
A name and signature are captured.
August 13: Commissioner Duheme relieves B.C.’s commanding officer of his duties.
The allegations date from 2016–2018.
The RCMP says they were “recently brought” to its attention.
FORTY-FIVE DAYS SEPARATE THE PHYSICAL DELIVERY AND THE ANNOUNCEMENT.
Maybe that’s coincidence.
Maybe what I sent went into one system while an entirely unrelated investigation was already underway somewhere else.
Maybe my correspondence never crossed the path of whatever ultimately resulted in McDonald’s removal.
Those are entirely possible explanations.
But there’s another possibility too.
Maybe somebody in Ottawa read what landed on their desk and started asking questions.
I don’t know.
And until there is evidence, neither does anybody reading this.
That is precisely why the question matters.
WHAT HAPPENED INSIDE THE RCMP BETWEEN JUNE 29 AND AUGUST 13, 2026?
And one question sits underneath all the others:
DID MY JUNE 8 LETTER HELP SET SOMETHING IN MOTION?
I’m not going to manufacture an answer.
I’ve given you the chronology.
I’ve shown you the delivery record.
I’ve shown you what the RCMP itself said.
I’ve given you the backstory.
Now you decide what you think it means.
YOU MAKE THE CALL.
— The Black Sheep
Leave a Reply