🚨 IT’S HAPPENING AGAIN! MY FAMILY IS ONCE AGAIN BEING TARGETED BY ONLINE HARASSMENT, CYBERBULLYING, THREATS, AND RELENTLESS EMAIL CAMPAIGNS — AND IT’S BEEN GOING ON SINCE MAY 2025!
🏠🔥 THE FIRST CAMPAIGN WAS FOLLOWED BY THE FIREBOMBING OF OUR FAMILY HOME ON JANUARY 22, 2026! I believe the harassment may have contributed to that attack, and the connection demands investigation.
⚠️ SO WHAT THE HELL HAPPENS NEXT?!
🏢💔 DOES MY WIFE LOSE HER JOB AT SELKIRK COLLEGE, TOO?!
🚔❓ HOW MUCH MORE DOES MY FAMILY HAVE TO ENDURE BEFORE SOMEONE TAKES THIS SERIOUSLY?!
🔎 LET’S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT THE EMAILS, THE PEOPLE INVOLVED, AND THE EVIDENCE!
📧🚨 288 EMAILS! THE SAME NAMES! THE SAME TACTICS! THE RCMP REPEATEDLY COPIED! AND MY FAMILY DRAGGED INTO THIS NIGHTMARE ALL OVER AGAIN!
🚔💥 AND WHAT HAS THE RCMP DONE TO STOP IT?! FROM WHERE I’M STANDING, NOTHING EFFECTIVE — JUST LIKE BEFORE!
⚠️ THE EMAILS KEEP COMING. THE HARASSMENT CONTINUES. AND MY FAMILY IS STILL WAITING FOR ANSWERS AND MEANINGFUL ACTION!
What began in May 2025 as what I allege was Danny Keith Martin’s relentless campaign of online bullying, harassment, and deliberate targeting of my family and my wife’s workplace (Selkirk College in Castlegar) has resurfaced in 2026—even after our family home was firebombed on January 22, 2026. I believe the earlier harassment campaign contributed to the circumstances surrounding that terrifying attack, although responsibility for the firebombing has not been established. Now, many of the same names are appearing again, alongside disturbing communications, threats, and hundreds of emails—raising serious questions about why this pattern continues and what authorities have done to stop it.
🚨 I DON’T EVEN KNOW SOME OF THESE PEOPLE! I’VE REPEATEDLY TOLD THEM TO STOP — I EVEN ISSUED A FORMAL CEASE-AND-DESIST NOTICE, WHICH WAS APPARENTLY IGNORED!
📧💥 AND YET THE EMAILS KEPT COMING! THEY’RE STILL COMING! I’VE RECEIVED PERHAPS ANOTHER 10 JUST THIS MORNING ALONE!
⚠️ HOW MANY TIMES DOES SOMEONE HAVE TO SAY “LEAVE ME AND MY FAMILY ALONE” BEFORE THE MESSAGE GETS THROUGH?!
The evidence raises serious questions about repeated unwanted contact, intimidation, workplace targeting, and what authorities knew as these communications continued.
This time, I’m laying out the numbers, the names, the dates, the actual emails, and the evidence for everyone to examine.
🚨 THE SAME NAMES. THE SAME TACTICS. THE SAME FAMILY BEING TARGETED — AGAIN!
What I allege began in May 2025 as Danny Keith Martin’s campaign of online harassment, intimidation, and targeting of my family and my wife’s workplace appears to have resurfaced in 2026—with familiar names, mass email chains, RCMP recipients, sexually degrading insults, disturbing communications, and my wife’s workplace once again dragged into the controversy.
📌 And this is nothing new! I was documenting and publicly raising concerns about Martin’s alleged harassment campaign in my October 2025 Black Sheep Whistleblower blog—more than a year ago!
The earlier warnings, the recurring names, and the subsequent firebombing of our family home on January 22, 2026, make the continuing communications particularly troubling. The connection between the harassment and the attack remains a matter requiring investigation.
👇 READ MY ORIGINAL OCTOBER 2025 BLACK SHEEP BLOG BELOW and compare what I was reporting then with the emails and evidence now emerging in 2026.
The question is no longer simply what happened. It’s why these same patterns keep resurfacing—and what has been done to address them.
🎃👻 A HALLOWEEN SPECIAL FOR THE CREEPS WHO JUST KEEP ON CREEPING! 💀🕷️
🚨 SAME CREEPS. SAME TACTICS. SAME FAMILY BEING TARGETED! 🚨
🦇 Since MAY 2025, my family has endured what I allege is an ongoing campaign of online harassment, intimidation, and cyberbullying.
💻📧 And guess what? IT’S STILL GOING ON TODAY — HALLOWEEN 2026! 🎃
👀 Some people apparently don’t know when to stop—even after being explicitly told to leave my family alone!
🐑🖤 THE BLACK SHEEP WHISTLEBLOWER — EXPOSING THE EMAILS, THE NAMES, THE DATES, AND THE RECEIPTS!
#Halloween2026 🎃 #BlackSheepWhistleblower 🐑 #OnlineHarassment #Cyberbullying #RCMP #FamilySafety #TheReceiptsDontLie
October 31, 2026 | Castlegar, British Columbia
🚨 FIRST, LET’S LOOK AT THE NUMBERS
Before anyone dismisses this as another disagreement on the internet, consider what I recently recovered from my mailbox.
I wrote a script to search my email messages, restricting the resulting archive to July 1 through October 31, 2026 which this new campaign of harassment started.
The search identified 404 matching messages and successfully archived 403 emails connected to correspondence involving Willemijn Perk.
Now, here’s where things get particularly disturbing.
I DO NOT KNOW THIS PERSON. I HAVE NEVER MET THIS PERSON. I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT THIS PERSON LOOKS LIKE!
The images below appear to depict the individual identifying themselves as Willemijn Perk, including photographs apparently involving the RCMP. I cannot independently verify whether the person pictured is actually Willemijn, or establish the circumstances surrounding those apparent police encounters.
However, similar photographs appear on a Facebook page associated with that identity.
I’m including just a few examples because the volume of correspondence attributed to this individual is extraordinary. The email archive identifies 195 messages sent from the Willemijn account during the period examined.
What I find particularly alarming is the content of the wider correspondence: references to death and suicide, statements I interpret as threatening, repeated personal attacks, and messages that appear to openly ridicule recipients while suggesting the RCMP is powerless to intervene.
Some of these communications even copied RCMP email addresses directly.
The photographs and correspondence raise obvious questions. Did police attend the location depicted? What were they responding to? Were the threats reported, investigated, or assessed? And why did these communications continue after I expressly demanded that I be left alone?
I am not suggesting that a photograph of police at someone’s home proves wrongdoing or police inaction. But when these images are circulated alongside disturbing communications and apparent mockery of law enforcement, I believe the circumstances warrant serious scrutiny.
Look at the images. Read the actual messages. Consider the recipient lists. Then ask yourself whether this is how repeated reports of threatening and unwanted online communications should be handled.
for more see this:
📘 Willemijn Perks Facebook Page — Visit this Facebook page to find RCMP-related videos, posts, and other content.
Willemijn Perks Facebook Page
RCMP-related videos, posts and updates
📧🚨 195 EMAILS FROM ONE PERSON — AND THAT’S JUST THE BEGINNING!
Since August 2026, emails from Willemijn Perk have been distributed to me and numerous other recipients, including RCMP personnel and Selkirk College email addresses.
📊 The histogram above documents 195 emails from Willemijn’s account alone! It does not include the additional messages from other participants repeatedly using “Reply All,” many of whom I had already blocked.
🚨💥 AND GET THIS — OCTOBER 26, 2026: 69 EMAILS IN A SINGLE DAY!
SIXTY-FUCKING-NINE EMAILS FROM WILLEMIJN PERK IN JUST 24 HOURS!
🤯 That’s nearly THREE EMAILS EVERY HOUR, averaged across an entire day!
⚠️ I DON’T KNOW THIS PERSON. I’VE FORMALLY TOLD THEM TO STOP CONTACTING ME. YET THE EMAILS KEPT COMING!
🚔 AND THE RCMP WERE REPEATEDLY INCLUDED IN THESE EMAIL CHAINS INITIALLY and WERE CALLED TO HER HOUSE TO CHECK AND DID NOTHING.
🐑🖤 This is just ONE sender in a much larger pattern of unwanted communications that I have been documenting. The numbers speak for themselves.
The preliminary sender statistics are:
| Identified sender | Emails |
|---|---|
| Willemijn Perk | 195 |
| Alicia Yashcheshen | 75 |
| Ryan Elson | 6 |
| Accounts using the name Ace Ventura | 10 |
| Other senders | 2 |
| Total | 288 |
These numbers alone do not prove that every message constitutes criminal harassment. Some messages form part of arguments involving multiple participants. However, the volume, the repeated copying of unwanted recipients, the explicit demands to stop, and the content of particular messages raise serious questions about the nature and purpose of these communications.
The October explosion
The complete 403-message archive contains:
- 371 messages dated in October 2026, approximately 92% of the archive.
- 111 messages dated October 26 alone, the busiest recorded day.
- 131 messages with at least one RCMP-domain recipient in the To or CC fields.
- 37 messages with a Selkirk College recipient in the To or CC fields.
These latter counts include the full archive, including my own outgoing messages. They are not counts of harassment offences or proof that the recipients read the correspondence.
Nevertheless, they reveal the scale of the email activity and the extraordinary extent to which police and workplace addresses appeared in these exchanges.
And here is the part that makes this particularly disturbing to me: I do not know many of these people. I did not invite them into my life, and I explicitly told them to leave me alone.
1. THIS DID NOT BEGIN IN JULY 2026. IT BEGAN AGAIN IN MAY 2025.
To understand why I regard these communications as harassment, we need to go back to May 2025.
That was when I say Danny Keith Martin began another campaign of unwanted communications and online accusations involving me and my family.
By September 2025, Martin’s communications had reached my wife’s workplace, Selkirk College, where she held a senior management position.
My wife had no obligation to participate in Martin’s disputes with me. Her workplace was not an appropriate forum for personal accusations, internet arguments, or attempts to pressure me.
Yet the communications involving her workplace became part of a larger pattern that I have documented through emails, social-media posts, complaints, and correspondence with authorities.
In my view, this was not simply criticism directed at me. It was an attempt to bring the consequences of an online dispute into my family’s personal and professional lives.
I subsequently reported the conduct to police.
The later email exchanges in August and October 2026 need to be examined against that earlier history.
The same names were appearing again. The same accusations were resurfacing. And once again, my family and workplace-related addresses were being drawn into communications we did not want.
2. I DID NOT KNOW WILLEMIJN PERK. SO WHY WAS I BEING INCLUDED?
On August 17, 2026, an email from Willemijn Perk appeared in the correspondence.
She wrote:
“What the hell is this shit about 🙄🙄🙄🙄”
It was a reasonable question.
Because I had essentially the same question.
I did not know Willemijn Perk. I had never had dealings with her, and I did not understand why my email address was being inserted into arguments involving people I had no desire to communicate with.
On August 18, 2026, at 11:32 a.m., I sent a formal cease-and-desist notice to Willemijn Perk and Alicia Yashcheshen, copying Cpl. Amanda Martel of the RCMP.
I wrote:
“I do not know you, I have never had any dealings with you, and I have no desire to become involved in whatever dispute you have been drawn into.”
I also stated:
“I have no clue.”
And:
“Leave me out of it.”
I expressly instructed the recipients to stop including me in their emails, group communications, disputes, and social-media campaigns.
I also made something else absolutely clear:
I AM NOT ACE VENTURA.
That statement was important because I had previously been subjected to allegations connecting me to an online identity I deny operating.
I wanted no misunderstanding about my identity, my position, or my refusal to participate in these exchanges.
Willemijn’s response
The forwarded correspondence attributes the following response to Willemijn:
“Hahahahahaha oh shut up you can’t do shit 🤣🤣🤣🤣”
Read that again.
I had formally demanded that an individual I did not know stop including me in unwanted communications.
I had copied an RCMP investigator to document my position.
And this was the response recorded in the email chain.
To me, it was dismissive and provocative, particularly in the context of the correspondence already involving my family.
Whether it meets the legal elements of harassment is a question for the authorities. But it is direct documentary evidence of how my request to be left alone was received.
3. THE RCMP WERE ON THE EMAIL CHAINS
One of the most remarkable aspects of the correspondence is the number of police addresses appearing in the recipient fields.
For example, the August 19, 2026 email chain included:
RCMP recipients
- Cpl. Amanda Martel — Amanda.martell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
- Kai Boodram — kai.boodram@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Workplace recipient
- My wife’s Selkirk College email address — [redacted for family privacy]
Other identified recipients
- Danny Keith Martin — hungrytruckerdann@
- Willemijn Perk — willemijn310@
- Ryan Elson — xtofury@
- Jolene Johnson — jolene@
- Alicia Yashcheshen — yashcheshen@
- Chris Pentecost — chrispentecost2010@
- Ace Ventura — drstoxxman@
- Tina Taphouse — Tina.Taphouse@
- Jessica Yaniv?! — waxmyballsshow@
- Barbara Doduk — barbaradoduk@
- Grant Davis — granthippy1967@
- Frannie — frannie302003@
- HBG1010 — HBG1010@
- Cultureguard — cultureguard@
- Donald Smith, NewsNowCanadaIndependentMedia2 — NewsNowCanadaIndependentMedia2
These are addresses appearing in a documented recipient list. Their inclusion does not establish that every recipient participated in, approved of, or even read the messages.
But their presence raises a serious question.
What did the recipients know about the communications, and what steps, if any, were taken after concerns were raised?
The RCMP addresses are particularly significant because I had already reported threats and harassment involving my family.
The correspondence also raises questions about whether police were being copied for legitimate reporting purposes, to provoke other participants, or simply because these exchanges had expanded into uncontrolled mass email chains.
Those questions deserve answers based on the records.
4. DANNY KEITH MARTIN: THE NAME THAT KEEPS COMING BACK
Danny Martin’s involvement matters because, in my account, the earlier workplace harassment began with his communications in 2025.
In an August 19, 2026 email chain, a message attributed to Martin began:
“As usual dickpic Drover you live in the land of delusion and alternate reality.”
The message continued with accusations about my professional history, personal conduct, and online activities.
I dispute the allegations Martin made about me.
What matters for this investigation is that his words appeared in a chain involving multiple private individuals, police recipients, and my wife’s workplace address.
This was not an isolated exchange between Martin and me.
It was part of a much broader distribution.
The Ace Ventura accusation
On October 5, 2026, another message attributed to Martin stated:
“Obviously the dickless wonder has been using the Ace Ventura email over the last year. You fucking con artists all need to be locked up.”
That wording is ambiguous about exactly whom Martin was accusing.
Nevertheless, it demonstrates that the Ace Ventura allegation remained part of these communications.
I have repeatedly denied being Ace Ventura.
I also allege that Ryan Elson and private investigator Jolene Johnson played roles behind the scenes in circulating or supporting that identification.
Their precise involvement must be established from the original messages and other records, rather than assumed from their appearance in recipient lists.
The central issue is whether a disputed identity allegation was repeatedly used to justify unwanted communications involving me, my family, and my wife’s workplace.
5. THE SEXUALIZED INSULTS, DISTURBING IMAGERY, AND THREATS
Some of the communications I have preserved contain sexually degrading insults, disturbing images, allegations involving child pornography, and material I interpreted as threatening.
Those categories must be examined separately.
An allegation involving child pornography is not evidence that the accused person possessed or produced such material. Likewise, an offensive image is not automatically a criminal threat.
For that reason, I intend to preserve the original communications and publish only carefully verified quotations and descriptions.
I will not reproduce potentially illegal sexual imagery or material involving minors.
What concerns me is the repeated use of inflammatory allegations and humiliating material in mass communications involving people who had not agreed to participate.
The October 5 chain, for example, includes discussion of distributing a video involving a police encounter.
Willemijn wrote:
“Here, I’ll attach the video, but get ready—it’ll be going everywhere, not just Facebook! 🤣👍👍”
The message illustrates the willingness of participants to discuss further public distribution of material within an already hostile exchange.
It does not, by itself, establish an offence.
But it is relevant to the broader pattern of online amplification, ridicule, and circulation of personal material that this investigation seeks to document.
6. RYAN ELSON AND JOLENE JOHNSON: THE QUESTIONS BEHIND THE ACE VENTURA CLAIM
Ryan Elson appears as a sender of six messages in the July–October archive and as a recipient in other chains.
Jolene Johnson also appears in recipient lists and in other communications I have preserved.
My allegation is that Elson and Johnson were involved in the background of the disputed Ace Ventura identification.
I want the following questions answered:
- Who first alleged that I was Ace Ventura?
- What evidence was used to support that allegation?
- Who communicated the claim to Danny Martin or other participants?
- Was the allegation subsequently circulated to my wife’s workplace?
- Were any corrections issued after my repeated denials?
These questions are especially important because an accusation circulated to someone’s employer or family can have consequences far beyond the original online dispute.
I believe the original communications will help establish the chronology and respective roles of the people involved.
7. THE JANUARY 22, 2026 FIREBOMBING CHANGED EVERYTHING
On January 22, 2026, our family home in Castlegar was firebombed.
My daughter and I were inside.
I extinguished the fires and was subsequently taken to hospital.
The RCMP later characterized the incident as a targeted attack.
That event fundamentally changed how I viewed subsequent threats, personal attacks, and unwanted communications.
It also made the earlier harassment allegations more urgent to me.
I believe investigators should examine whether the preceding campaign of harassment had any connection to the attack.
I am not claiming that the email records, on their own, establish who planned or committed the firebombing.
But the chronological relationship between the earlier threats, workplace communications, police warnings, and the attack deserves a thorough examination.
My family has lived with the consequences.
When similar names and accusations resurfaced in later email chains, I did not regard them as harmless internet banter.
8. WHY WAS MY WIFE’S WORKPLACE STILL BEING COPIED?
This is one of the central questions of the entire investigation.
My wife was not responsible for my disputes with Danny Martin or anyone else.
Yet her Selkirk College address appeared in communications involving accusations, insults, police recipients, and people connected to earlier online conflicts.
The archive identifies 37 messages containing a Selkirk College address in the To or CC fields.
That figure includes all senders, including correspondence I sent myself, so further analysis is required to identify precisely which messages originated from others and which were unwanted.
Still, the original communications establish that her workplace address had become part of these exchanges.
I believe Selkirk College should be asked what communications it received, whether workplace safety concerns were assessed, and what steps were taken to protect its employee from unwanted third-party contact.
Those are legitimate questions of institutional accountability.
9. THE SAME NAMES. TWO PERIODS. ONE FAMILY.
What I find most troubling is the recurrence of individuals and accusations across the two periods.
In the first period, beginning in May 2025, I allege that Danny Keith Martin engaged in harassment that eventually reached my wife’s workplace.
In the second period, during August–October 2026, the archived correspondence shows Willemijn Perk, Alicia Yashcheshen, Ryan Elson, accounts using the name Ace Ventura, and other participants appearing in mass email exchanges.
Danny Martin’s statements also appear within those chains.
The overlap is documented.
Whether that overlap demonstrates coordination, shared objectives, or simply recurring participation in online disputes is something the underlying evidence must establish.
But it is reasonable to ask why the same disputes, identities, and allegations kept returning after I had expressly demanded that the communications stop.
10. QUESTIONS FOR THE RCMP AND SELKIRK COLLEGE
I believe the following questions deserve clear answers.
To the RCMP:
How many of the messages copied to RCMP addresses were received and reviewed? Were the reported threats, images, and unwanted communications assessed together with earlier harassment complaints? Were any follow-up actions documented?
To Selkirk College:
What communications involving my wife’s workplace address were received? What assessment was made of the repeated third-party contact? What protective measures were considered, and what records exist of the college’s response?
To the individuals who sent or circulated the communications:
Why were my family and I included in these exchanges after I expressly requested that the contact stop? What evidence supported the allegations connecting me to Ace Ventura? Who originated those claims, and who repeated them?
11. MY CONCLUSION: THIS DESERVES MORE THAN A SHRUG
I did not know Willemijn Perk.
I did not invite her to communicate with me.
I sent a formal notice telling her to stop.
I copied an RCMP investigator.
The correspondence records a dismissive response, and the wider archive documents hundreds of related messages over the following months.
Meanwhile, names connected to earlier disputes involving Danny Martin, my family, and my wife’s workplace continued appearing.
I regard the repeated unwanted communications, personal attacks, and involvement of my family’s workplace as part of a serious pattern of harassment.
Whether particular communications satisfy the legal requirements for criminal harassment, uttering threats, defamatory publication, or other offences is for investigators and courts to determine.
But the emails deserve to be examined as evidence—not dismissed simply because they occurred online.
Because this was never just about emails.
It was about the effect of repeated unwanted communications on a family already dealing with serious threats, the destruction caused by a firebombing, and the continuing question of whether institutions responded adequately when concerns were brought to their attention.
And the records are still there.
403 exported messages. Repeated names. Repeated allegations. Police addresses. Workplace addresses. And an explicit demand to stop.
The next step is to examine the full contents of those messages, establish exactly who said what, and require answers from the institutions that received the complaints.
The Black Sheep
Evidence and methodology: This article draws on the July 1–October 31, 2026 Apple Mail index, previously supplied August 2026 email chains, the October 5 correspondence, and my account of earlier events. The archive’s sender statistics exclude my outgoing correspondence. Recipient counts refer to all archived messages. The underlying original emails and attachments should be checked before publication of further allegations. A copied recipient is not automatically a participant in misconduct, and no causal responsibility for the January 22 firebombing is established by these email records alone.
#BlackSheepWhistleblower #Castlegar #SelkirkCollege #RCMP #OnlineHarassment #WorkplaceSafety #PublicAccountability #DigitalEvidence #BritishColumbia
Leave a Reply