September 19–28, 2025 | A documented timeline of public threats, accusations and workplace harassment
What do you call it when someone publicly demands that you stop doing something you aren’t doing — and threatens to target your wife’s workplace if you don’t comply?
I call it extortion because it is!!!! … its also called criminal harassment of my wife at her workplace!!! Note that Danny Keith Martins Hungrytrucker account has recently been suspended on X so he cant do this to another family!!! All of this was reported to the RCMP at the time in September 2025.
And that is precisely what I allege Danny Keith Martin, operating the X account HUNGRYTRUCKER (@HungryTrucker), was attempting to do to me in September 2025.
There is one rather significant problem with Martin’s accusations:
I WAS NOT SENDING HIM HARASSING EMAILS. I WAS NOT “ACE VENTURA.” AND I WAS NOT OPERATING THE GANGSTERISMOUT WEBSITE.
Nevertheless, Martin repeatedly published allegations against me, identified my wife and her workplace, and threatened to distribute supposedly incriminating emails to her employer’s entire staff and faculty.
I have retained screenshots showing exactly what was published, when the screenshots were taken, and what Martin was threatening.
Here is the documented chronology. But before I begin this is the email that Danny Keith Martin sent to me on September 21 2025 .. he was seeking a truce and apparently he never even wrote this it was Michael Martinz who wrote it for him who was at that time the jilted fiance of Svetlana Dalla Lana…. this needs no commentary.
From: Danny Martin <hungrytruckerdann@>
Subject: An enemy of you enemy may just be your greatest ally….
Date: September 21, 2025 at 4:28:51 PM PDT
To: dave_drover@hotmail.com
Good Day Dave,
I have managed to locate the guy you refer to as “Gangster Mike” [referring to Michael Martinz]. Turns out he has no social media presence and as such has missed the entirety of this gong show to this point.
I have shared with him your most recent detailed revelations regarding Svetlana’s action on your “Blacksheep Whistleblower” blog. He was rather shocked to learn that any of this was going on, and more shocked by the mis-representation and outright lies that Svetlana has told you.
He is very interested in the fact that you and Svetlana seemed to have a very close friendship, when he was told a much different and disparaging story. As you have suggested to me on a number of occasions that you have many nudes from Svetlana, including a bunch of pussy pics, he has expressed great anger towards her that she would have shared such photos with another man while they were “happily engaged”.
Mike would like to chat with you, with me as a moderator in the very near future. In his words, “looks like she lied her face off and played the both of us badly”.
If in fact you can produce screenshots of those nude photos, or even better, text message exchanges where she is sending those photos to you, he has assured me that he will work alongside you to bring her down, and to expose her for the liar and harlot that she is. No more “poor me victim, I had my kids taken away BS”. In his words, “she is disliked by many many people, and if Dave really wants to shine a light on her filthy actions he has missed a number of key influential people with huge followings that would relish in sharing that dirt on her”.
In closing, he finds the whole issue rather amusing and bears no anger towards you. He is however very angry to learn that he was double crossed by Svetlana, and that she was spreading lies about his character to you, and likely to other people as well.
Your prompt response is appreciated. Lets try and get the three of us onto a Telegram chat in the very near future and resolve this issue as soon as possible.
I’d appreciate it if you kept this information confidential.
Danny Martin
📅 SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 — MY WIFE AND HER WORKPLACE ARE PUBLICLY IDENTIFIED
In a post estimated to have been published September 19, based on its displayed age of four days when captured on September 23 at 3:10:03 p.m., the HUNGRYTRUCKER account stated:
“Dick pic David Drover @DavidDrover1476 is a con artist from Castlegar British Columbia. David right now is involved in a sextortion harassment smear campaign against myself and former nurse who was this family friend. David’s wife is [redacted] works with [redacted].”
The original screenshot contains my wife’s name and employer. Both are intentionally withheld from this article.
The post also displayed personal photographs of my wife and me.
Why was my wife’s employment relevant to Martin’s allegations against me?
It wasn’t necessary to identify her employer to dispute anything I had allegedly done.
Yet her workplace was publicly identified to an account displaying approximately 100,700 followers when the screenshot was captured.
📅 SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 — THE FIRST DOCUMENTED WORKPLACE THREAT
At 7:07:41 a.m. on September 23, I captured a post marked approximately one day old.
Martin’s account stated:
“I told these two con artists Dick pic David Drover @DavidDrover1476 and his extortionist buddy Daryl Grant MacAskill @CanadaStoxx that starting today their daily harassment emails will be forwarded to the entire faculty and staff of [redacted] where David’s wife [redacted] works.”
Workplace and spouse identifiers are redacted in this article.
Read that carefully.
Martin was announcing that emails he attributed to me and another individual would be forwarded to my wife’s workplace.
I deny sending the alleged harassment emails.
Martin’s public accusations did not establish who authored those communications.
📅 SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 — ANOTHER PUBLIC ACCUSATION
A second post, captured on September 23 at 7:07:44 a.m., stated:
“Wrong again con artists! Dick pic aficionado David Drover @DavidDrover1476 and his extortionist buddy @CanadaStoxx so far can’t get any of their fraud stories right on their bully blogs. David and Daryl have spent time behind bars for fraud and harassment.”
This was another series of personal allegations presented publicly as fact.
I dispute the allegations directed at me.
The screenshot recorded 638 views at the time of capture.
📅 SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 — THE CONDITIONAL THREAT
At 7:08:05 a.m. on September 23, I captured what I consider the most significant post in this series.
Martin’s account wrote:
“Ok dick pic David Drover @DavidDrover1476 these hundreds of emails daily by your con artist buddy Daryl Grant MacAskill @CanadaStoxx all stop today. Otherwise they will all be sent to the entire staff and faculty of [redacted] where [redacted] works. Govern yourself accordingly.”
The workplace and spouse identifiers are withheld from publication.
“ALL STOP TODAY. OTHERWISE…”
Those are the words that matter.
The post imposed a demand and attached a consequence: alleged emails would be circulated throughout my wife’s workplace if they did not stop.
The screenshot recorded 283 views.
I was not sending Martin hundreds of emails daily. I was not sending him harassment emails at all.
I was not Ace Ventura.
And I had no ability to stop messages written by someone else.
Yet my wife’s workplace was being used as the destination for threatened communications intended to pressure me.
📅 SEPTEMBER 23, 2025 — THE TIMING OF INTERNAL WORKPLACE CORRESPONDENCE
This date is especially significant.
The screenshots were captured early that morning, at approximately 7:07–7:08 a.m., with another at 3:10 p.m.
Separately, records subsequently disclosed through a freedom-of-information process identify an internal email dated September 23, 2025, at 8:15 a.m., involving senior management at my wife’s employer and referring to allegations of harassment involving me.
That creates an important chronological question:
What information was being circulated within my wife’s workplace on September 23, and what evidence was used to attribute the alleged emails to me?
I have received a 21-page disclosure in which substantial portions were redacted. I am challenging those redactions through the appropriate privacy-review process.
I cannot establish from the disclosed material that management accepted Martin’s allegations, or that the internal correspondence resulted directly from these posts.
But the proximity of the dates warrants examination.
📅 SEPTEMBER 28, 2025 — ANOTHER POST IDENTIFYING MY WIFE’S WORKPLACE
A further post, attributed to Danny Martin and dated September 28, 2025, again named my wife and her employer while making personal allegations against me.
The visible text read:
“Dick pic David Drover @DavidDrover1476 and his obsession with Svetlana’s sex life with his wife [redacted]”
Spouse and workplace identifiers are withheld from this article.
On October 7, 2025, a screenshot of a platform notification displayed the words:
“We removed your post.”
The notification reproduced the September 28 post.
The screenshot documents a removal notice. It does not establish which platform rule was applied or why the post was removed.
⚖️ WHY I ALLEGE THIS WAS EXTORTION
Section 346 of the Canadian Criminal Code addresses extortion involving threats, accusations, menaces or violence used to induce another person to do something or cause something to be done.
I believe Martin’s September 22 conditional threat deserves investigation under that provision.
Consider the documented elements:
- 🔴 The demand: Stop the allegedly harassing emails.
- 🔴 The threatened consequence: Emails would be distributed to the entire staff and faculty of my wife’s workplace.
- 🔴 The pressure point: My wife’s employment and professional reputation.
- 🔴 The disputed premise: I deny authoring or sending the emails Martin attributed to me.
- 🔴 The documentary evidence: Timestamped screenshots preserving Martin’s publicly displayed words.
Whether those circumstances meet the legal elements of extortion is a question for investigators and, ultimately, a court. No criminal finding is established by these screenshots.
But the conditional threat itself is not something I have invented. Its wording is preserved in the evidence.
🔍 THE ACE VENTURA ACCUSATION
I want to be absolutely clear.
I am not Ace Ventura. I was not Ace Ventura in September 2025. I did not author the emails attributed to that identity, and I did not operate GangsterismOut.
I have repeatedly denied these allegations.
The fact that someone receives emails from an account using a particular name does not establish that I controlled that account.
Nor does publicly repeating the allegation make it true.
If Martin or anyone else possesses reliable technical evidence linking me to those communications, that evidence should be produced and independently examined.
🐑 THE BLACK SHEEP QUESTION
What concerns me most is not simply what Martin posted.
It is the possibility that unverified public accusations were circulated into my wife’s professional environment and influenced how others perceived me or my family.
That possibility requires evidence, not assumptions.
The original screenshots, their capture times, the September 23 internal correspondence, and the heavily redacted records provide a clear basis for further investigation.
I want the underlying records disclosed. I want the identity allegations tested against actual evidence. And I want the threatened workplace communications examined for what they were.
My wife should never have been made the pressure point in a dispute over emails I deny sending.
The public record now contains the dates, the words, and the screenshots.
The next question is what the people receiving those allegations actually knew — and when they knew it.
BLACK SHEEP INVESTIGATIONS
Evidence first. Accountability through documentation.
Evidence and publication notice
This article is based on five supplied screenshots depicting posts attributed to the HUNGRYTRUCKER account and a platform removal notification. The dates, quoted language and displayed engagement figures are drawn from those screenshots. Posting dates described as estimated are calculated from relative age indicators and are not independently verified publication timestamps.
References to extortion describe my allegation and my interpretation of the documented communications. They do not represent a criminal charge, conviction or judicial finding against Danny Keith Martin.
Allegations concerning authorship of emails, criminal conduct, online identities and the motivations of third parties remain disputed unless independently established. My statements denying authorship of the alleged communications are firsthand denials, not independently verified technical findings.
My wife’s name and workplace have been intentionally omitted from this article to limit further exposure. Original screenshots and unredacted evidence are retained separately for appropriate investigative or legal purposes.
One important publication precaution: the original screenshots still display your wife’s name and her employer. If you publish the images with this article, those identifiers need to be obscured in every visible instance, including embedded screenshots within the posts. The article above keeps them out of the published narrative while preserving the quoted threats’ substance.
Leave a Reply